How Social Media Is Bad For Health

How Social Media is Bad For Health?

Although people spend more and more time on social networks, over-enthusiasm becomes shameful. Many hide from friends and acquaintances how long they flip through social media or lie. Recent personal data scandals and fake news do not stop people from wanting to read and communicate in social media but undermine the advertising business. These are the main findings of a new Ericsson Consumer Lab study entitled “#OMG Social media is here to stay.”

More than three billion people use social networks, and this is the main activity for many on the Internet. Now people spend 47 minutes a day on social networks compared to 30 minutes in 2014. 60% of users communicate on instant messengers, almost 50% read news on the content feed, 20% make voice or video calls, and 30% search for information about products and services every week.

The market leader is Facebook Inc., which owns three platforms at once – Facebook, Instagram, and WhatsApp. The number of users of these platforms has grown from 1.3 billion in 2014 to 2.5 billion unique active users at present. This trend is relevant to compete for services.

Approximately 30% of users find it embarrassing to admit how much time they spend on social networks. At the same time, two-thirds of the respondents believe that their friends tell a lie. The fifth part of respondents considers excessive interest in social media as a socially deprecated occupation, and 70% think it harmful to health. As a result, people who spend more time on social networks do not want their environment to know about the real scale of the problem.

The leak of personal data, as well as inaccurate advertising, phishing, bullying and the problem of Internet addiction, have undermined the credibility of social networks. Less than 20% trust their data now, and 60% have concerns about how social networks manage their personal information. However, at the same time, although 30% of respondents used social networks less often after the scandals, a third of them then returned to their usual pattern of behavior.

Shakes and likes, allowing you to share information quickly, made the problem of fake news especially urgent for social networks. About half of the respondents saw social media information, which later turned out to be unreliable. Almost one in four admitted that s/he oneself shared links to news, which then turned out to be untrue. As a result, less than 20% of users trust information seen in social networks. This trend negatively affects the sales of advertising through social media.

There is exceptionally high competition in the market of social networks. The fact that 5 of the ten most popular platforms of 2008 ceased to exist is the evidence. It is Windows Live Spaces, Yahoo! GeoCities, Baidu Space. Only two of the platforms that were popular ten years ago remain in the top today – these are Facebook and Flickr. The fifth part of users believes that in another five years they will use completely different services than they do now.

Social media needs to work on its reputation to solve the problem with personal data and fake news. Otherwise, it will negatively affect their income. Social media has a short life cycle, and services that are experiencing a boom today may disappear from the market shortly, according to Ericsson Consumer Lab.

The Internet is an environment with fast action and quick reactions. A rapid change of sources of significant concern teaches the brain to work with the abnormally short intervals of time that are set by online space. However, the Internet environment is unnatural for our mind, which has adapted itself to completely different speeds in the course of evolution. Moreover, this artificial environment with its high speeds contradicts the natural rhythms of nature.

Looking on the screen, a person finds one self in a world where s/he is still required to wait. Besides, we forgot how to expect. The brain of such a person ceases to perceive the information flowing in the normal flow in general. Reading books with such a history is generally unrealistic. Mosaic consciousness – this is how it was called earlier, before the emergence of the mass Internet. However, what were these pathetic video clips compared to the totality of Internet resources? A drop in the bucket!

Disruption of synaptic connections in the brain inevitably occurs if:

A person spends more time online than outside of it;
A person experiences one`s strongest emotions online (these emotions are generously bestowed upon us by social networks), And if a person has been doing this since childhood – when synaptic connections in the brain are to form. Friend list is a socialization substitute only.

Here are just some of the pathological reactions produced by social networks addiction:

People become aware of themselves only through the responses of other people, often expecting an immediate response to each new photo posted! If there is no reaction, it is a tragedy.

People increase the number of friends, forgetting that virtual friendship kills the skills of building healthy relationships.

Real life begins to seem too complicated for such people; their consciousness becomes childish, infantile.

Yes, real life is indeed a tricky thing, but not everyone, realizing this fact, begins to be afraid to leave the house and experience obvious difficulties in real communication.

If you spend a lot of time on the Internet, remember: from this speed very soon you will no longer be satisfied with our slow life, while we do not have another one. You will become irritable and demanding, and you risk not waiting for your loved one because s/he is only a person, not a picture on the screen.

There is only one way out, which is meditation. The Internet is the ideal breeding ground for the Dragon of Impatience; today it spends most of its time there. To know this dragon in person, and not to become his victim, spread in immobility, remember our recent material.

In principle, a social network with its emoticons and circles, with its eternal universal adoration and bouquets from unfamiliar people is not the worst thing for a mature person. The social network can cause the most significant damage only to a teenager who, because of his or her age, already has problems with socialization and building up normal relationships with peers. “What to do if they spend hours in Facebook” – you ask. Psychologists say – hours per day is enough to read the messages answer them and find something else useful for oneself. Anything from above is already harmful, already of the devil.

Infantile children grow up becoming childish adults. Childish adults never leave the house of their parents – it is very comfortable for them and their little children to live there. Think about it, moms and dads.

About the author:
Melisa Marzett is a full-time valued writer and a member of paper services writing group. She stands for a healthy lifestyle; she likes giving and sharing let alone getting but experience and glass-half-full kind of person.